Activity-based costing is a costing method that assigns indirect costs to activities and to the products based on each product’s use of activities. Activity-based costing is based on the premise: Products consume activities; activities consume resources. Activity based costing (ABC) assigns manufacturing overhead costs to products in a more logical manner than the traditional approach of simply allocating costs on the basis of machine hours. Activity based costing first assigns costs to the activities that are the real cause of the overhead. It then assigns the cost of those activities only to the products that are actually demanding the activities. Activity based costing is an important domain in the PMP exam, so the best PMP prep course will help you score well in this section.
Business people have moved to adopt ABC by a desire to improve costing accuracy, mainly to get closer to the actual cost and true profitability of individual products and services. And, they also move to ABC to understand better the actual costs and return on investment from projects, programs, or other initiatives.
For example, consider a firm that manufactures automobile parts through a sequence of machine operations on a metal stock. In such settings, traditional cost accounting views "product production costs" as either direct costs or indirect costs (or overhead).
Traditionally, direct costs for such firms are costs they can assign to specific product units. In product manufacturing, these might include direct materials and direct labor costs:
Traditionally, indirect costs for such firms are manufacturing overhead expenses they cannot assign directly to specific product units. Instead, they allocate these costs to specific production runs, batches, or time periods. These might include indirect costs such as the following:
In ABC, the direct costs are allocated as is done in traditional method. It is only the overheads or indirect costs are allocated differently.
An Illustration:
Let us take an example to understand the difference in costing in ABC vs Traditional costing.
Let's examine the concept of activity based costing by looking at two common manufacturing activities: (1) the setting up of a production machine for running batches of products, and (2) the actual production of the units of product.
We will assume that a company with following information:
For our simple two-activity example, let's see how the rates for allocating the manufacturing overhead would look with activity based costing and without activity based costing:
SL.no | Iteam | With ABC | Without ABC |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Overhead-Machine Setup Costs | $ 200,000 | $-0- |
2 | No of Set ups | 400 | Not Applicable |
3 | Mfg Overhead set up cost per Batch | $500 | $-0- |
4 | Total Mfg Overhead Costs | $2,000,000 | $ 2,000,000 |
5 | Less-Costs traced to Machine Hours | $2000,000 | $-0- |
6 | Overhead costs to Machine Hours | $1,800,000 | $ 2,000,000 |
7 | Total Machine Hours | $1,00,000 | 1,00,000 |
8 | mfg Overhead cost per Machine Hour | $18 | $20 |
9 | Mfg overhead and cost allocations | $500 set up cost per batch +$18 per Machine Hour | $20 per MH |
Next, let's see what impact these different allocation techniques and overhead rates would have on the per unit cost of a specific unit of output. Assume that a company manufactures a batch of 5,000 units and it produces 50 units per machine hour, here is how the cost assigned to the units with activity based costing and without activity based costing compares:
Sl No | Item | With ABC | Without ABC |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mfg Overhead set Up Cost per Batch | $ 500 | $-0- |
2 | No of units in batch | 50,000 | Not Application |
3 | Mfg Overhead caused by setup-per unit | $ 0.01 | Not Application |
4 | Mfg Overhead caused cost per Machine Hour | $ 18 | $20 |
5 | No.of units produced per Machine Hour | 50 | 50 |
6 | Mfg O/H caused by production-per Unit | $ 0.36 | $0.40 |
7 | Total Mfg O/H Allocated - per Unit | $ 0.46 | $0.40 |
If a company manufactures a batch of 50,000 units and produces 50 units per machine hour, here is how the cost assigned to the units with ABC and without ABC compares:
Sl No | Item | With ABC | Without ABC |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mfg Overhead set Up Cost per Batch | $ 500 | $-0- |
2 | No of units in batch | 50,000 | Not Application |
3 | Mfg Overhead caused by setup-per unit | $ 0.01 | Not Application |
4 | Mfg Overhead caused cost per Machine Hour | $ 18 | $20 |
5 | No.of units produced per Machine Hour | 50 | 50 |
6 | Mfg O/H caused by production-per Unit | $ 0.36 | $0.40 |
7 | Total Mfg O/H Allocated - per Unit | $ 0.37 | $0.40 |
As the tables above illustrate, with activity based costing the cost per unit decreases from $0.46 to $0.37 because the cost of the setup activity is spread over 50,000 units instead of 5,000 units. Without ABC, the cost per unit is $0.40 regardless of the number of units in each batch.
If companies base their selling prices on costs, a company not using an ABC approach might lose the large batch work to a competitor who bids a lower price based on the lower, more accurate overhead cost of $0.37.
It's also possible that a company not using ABC may find itself being the low bidder for manufacturing small batches of product, since its $0.40 is lower than the ABC model of $0.46 for a batch size of 5,000 units. With its bid price based on manufacturing overhead of $0.40—but a true cost of $0.46—the company may end up doing lots of production for little or no profit.
A valuable piece of knowledge. Thank you!
This blog is appreciated, thanks.
I like the article. Thank you very much.
Thank you for the information.
The content of the motivation theories are well explained and its has been of great help to me . Thank you for making it that easy for easy understanding.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *